red reading
Active Member
now explain compressor serge to the masses makaveli.
I think stumo's answer on the first page was the better one in all honesty :lol:
I want to be there when you explain this to craig,bob (the formula):lol::lol::lol:
Haven't I done that one already under "why BOV are a waste of time101" :lol:now explain compressor serge to the masses makaveli.
I think stumo's answer on the first page was the better one in all honesty :lol:
So in very simple terms are you sayingOK I'm cheating, I know I was banned (sorry Bob) but I can't help it (comes with being a know-it-all-engineer so the missus tells me)
Sorry Skiddus I see your most on the second page now, I lost it amongst all this talk of balloons. However I think the effect you were seeing with swapping the elbow is different to the effect of a bigger turbine. The elbow creates a back pressure on the turbine exit which reduces the expansion ratio over the turbine for a given flow (engine speed) and hence reduces the power the turbine supplies to the compressor for those conditions.
There are two effects happening when fitting a bigger turbo and people seem to have got caught up on the one with the lesser effect.
1. Most importantly bigger turbine = less pressure in exhaust manifold for a given flow rate (i.e. engine speed). Therefore if we consider 2 cylinders of an engine, which happen to have their inlet and exhaust strokes at the same time. If the inlet manifold is at a higher pressure than the exhaust manifold the inlet stroke is being pushed down by a higher pressure than the exhaust stroke has to push against to expel the exhaust gas. This decreases pumping losses across the engine, increasing efficiency and therefore power. So clearly the lower the pressure in the exhaust manifold the larger this effect becomes.
2. The second point can be summed up in two words which I’ve not seen yet in this thread (sorry to anyone if I’ve missed them): VOLUMETRIC EFFICIENCY
Part of the problem is that the name volumetric efficiency is misleading, however much air is in the cylinder it will fill it (gas will always expand to fill it container), so volumetrically the cylinder is always full. It really refers to the amount or mass of air that enters the cylinder on the inlet stroke compared to how much air is in the cylinder at BDC during static condition (for a given pressure and temperature)
As has been stated running a bigger compressor means its doing less work to the air and therefore heats it less, resulting in denser air and higher volumetric efficiency.
Another way of looking at it is to apply the following equation:
MAP = (M*R*T)/(0.5*N*VE*V)
Where:
MAP – is the required inlet manifold pressure (absolute)
M – is the mass flow rate required for a desired power output (calculated from assume BFSC, AFR )
R – Gas constant
T – temperature (in Kelvin)
N – engine speed
VE – volumetric efficiency
V – engine displacement
From here we can see that increasing the inlet temp (i.e. small or badly matched compressor) gives us a double hit as it also decreases VE meaning that to supply enough air to achieve the same power MAP has to increase.
Wow very informative thread guys!
I'm not going to pretend I'm an expert on this matter (or any other!) as I'm certainly not, but it seems to me that people are getting a bit too caught up in the whole pressure thing.
I'm assuming that one turbo is larger than the other, so I would imagine the only purpose of this would be a larger flow rate of air, or in other words, over the same length of time the larger turbo would flow more air.
So instead of using the common method of boost pressure e.g. 1bar, 1.2bar etc. would it not be more accurate to work out how much air a particular turbo flows @ any specific pressure?
Pressure seems to me to be only a factor of the equation, like saying "My vehicle has 1000bhp!" but without knowing the weight of said vehicle, stating the power is pointless, just like stating boost pressure without flow rate.
If we go back to the very basic principle of how an internal combustion engine works, its only 3 elements (Fuel, Air, Source of Ignition) that make it all happen.
Once again I have to point out that I'm not an expert so please someone correct me where I am wrong.
So I'll assume we all know that for maximum efficiency the Air/Fuel mixture has to be just right and that an increase in one has to be proportionate to the other, but the basic principle is that the more air and fuel you can pump into the engine and ignite over any given time = more power.
Ok back to turbos. So if a car is set to run at 1bar of boost on a standard T28 turbo, the turbo is actually flowing X amount of air. If however, the car was running a larger turbo the same volume of air flow would be achieved at a lower pressure due to the same amount of air being passed through a larger surface area.
If this is true then upping the pressure back to the original 1bar would mean you'd need more air to flow through the larger turbo to achieve the 1 bar. So purely as an example and please don't take these volumes literally because I'm just going to totally make them up as an example. If you need say 1 cubic metre of air per second to achieve 1bar of boost with a T28, you may need 1.5 cubic meters of air per second to achieve 1bar on the larger turbo.
So what I can understand is that there are 2 main reasons for getting a bigger turbo. 1. Is to be able to flow a higher volume of air, thus allowing a higher volume of fuelling which would equal = more power. 2. Is realiability. As stated earlier, the larger turbo doesn't have to work as hard to achieve the same flow of air as the smaller turbo and doesn't have to spin as fast which I guess would potentially increase the units life span. Not to mention that air heats up under compression so the lower pressure of the big turbo would mean lower charge temps which is obviousy good all round.
Well thats my take on it anyway, but please realise that contrary to how I've written this post, I'm sort of asking it as a question, not trying to make out I know it all. Indeed, I would like clarification where I'm right and wrong on this subject as I find it very interesting.
exactly matt all those 3 are constants in any engine more air/fuel = more power but here we are merely discussing the air volume and what craig originally asked myselfIf we go back to the very basic principle of how an internal combustion engine works, its only 3 elements (Fuel, Air, Source of Ignition) that make it all happen.
In short yes, just thought I'd try to explain how a bigger turbo has those effects and why they increase power output.So in very simple terms are you saying
1. lower exhaust back pressure
2. Increased volumetric efficiency
I don't see any need for that :roll:. I wasn't trying to be a smart arse, I was trying to give an informative answer. However if you'd rather I won't waste my f*cking time in futreCan you do a diagram with balloons and compressors on it please?
Chill out fella it was a joke .I don't see any need for that :roll:. I wasn't trying to be a smart arse, I was trying to give an informative answer. However if you'd rather I won't waste my f*cking time in futre