skiddusmarkus
Active Member
If this is the case, is it a matter of just resetting it to zero(for starters) or would it then need the map tweaking again?
You can record time on the road, but not the dyno, as the load varies depending on the run. Its not like a fixed mass (inertia) dyno like some of the USA ones where you spin a big weight etc.Ed, if it turns out to be the cam timing which seems to be the general consensus then is it better to just have them zeroed locally or wait until I come to you ie is it going to drasticly alter your map?
I was going to take the cover off today but its howling with wind and I'm not risking shit getting blown into the head while the top is off so should get it done at the weekend.
Again, the car drives much better than it looks on the graph but then I did spend quite a lot of time and money getting the right bits together to help the engine rev better.I was talking to Danny yesterday and I was saying how power graphs should also have time plotted too, so you could see how quickly the revs build up at full throttle, it would give you more of an idea how responsive an engine was.
You'd like to think so but if the cam timing is set at stock then it must be. Do a quick search on cam timing and skimmed heads and you'll see what I mean.Campbell the cams were fitted aat the same time as the engine rebuilt and gasket fitted so you'd think this was taken into account.
Only cos we couldn't get the engine to turn over smoothly, could have halved that time if it had . And we did get it to within 1/2 Degree 8)You'd like to think so but if the cam timing is set at stock then it must be. Do a quick search on cam timing and skimmed heads and you'll see what I mean.
It took Stu(mo) a good 4 hours to fettle my cam timing. It's the kind of slow job people skip.